THE ROLE OF THE EU “SOFT” LAW IN THE FIGHT AGAINST THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC (INITIAL STAGE – MARCH – AUGUST 2020)

Authors

  • K. V. Makarchuk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/klj/2024.1.42

Keywords:

“soft” law, legal means of preventing the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, legal mechanisms of the European Union.

Abstract

Abstract. The article analyzes the theory, direct practice and peculiarities of application of the so-called soft law of the EU in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. The European Union law, in parallel and in cooperation with national initiatives of the Member States, played an important, if not decisive, role in combating the spread of the pandemic at its initial stage. In addition to “normal” legislative measures (or, in some legal systems, administrative rulemaking in the form of governmental or ministerial decrees), much of the regulation of the fight against COVID-19 has been made through circulars, instructions, guidelines, and other soft law instruments adopted at the Community level. Soft law instruments usually do not have full legal force, but can have legal and practical consequences: they can become a legal basis for the development of national legislation of EU Member States (in the field of combating the pandemic), provide a regulatory framework for smoothing out contradictions between national and European legislation in overcoming the pandemic as a global challenge to humanity, specify responsibilities of institutional cooperation, etc. The shifting normativity characterizing soft law in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic has emerged and operated in a complex and highly flexible system of international, supranational, domestic and subnational actors, both public and private. The study of the role of soft law in countering the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe has influenced the choice of strategies based on soft law instruments in the fight against the pandemic at the international level (UN, WHO), where soft law has become the only tool, given the lack of competence and/or mandatory powers in such matters. The analysis of the effect of soft legislation in the relevant period leads to the conclusion that this toolkit helped to cope with the crisis caused by the spread of COVID-19 at its initial, most acute stage (at the EU level) with the least losses.

References

Eliantonio M., Stefan O. The elusive legitimacy of EU soft law: an analysis of consultation and participation in the process of adopting COVID-19 soft law in the EU. European Journal of Risk Regulation. 2021. Vol. 12(1). pp. 159–175.

Eliantonio M., Korkea-Aho E., Vaughan S. EJRR Special Issue Editorial: COVID-19 and Soft Law: Is Soft Law Pandemic-Proof? European Journal of Risk Regulation. 2021. Vol. 12(1). pp. 1–6.

European Commission. Covid-19. Guidelines for border management measures to protect health and ensure the availability of goods and essential services. Official Journal of the European Union. 2020. URL: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/07835312-679b-11ea-b735-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

Conclusions by the President of the European Council following the video conference with members of the European Council on Covid-19. European Council. Statements and remarks. 2020. URL: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/03/17/conclusions-by-the-president-of-the-europeancouncil-following-the-video-conference-with-members-of-the-european-council-on-covid-19/

UNHCR Legal Considerations with regard to the EU Commission´s Guidelines for border management measures to protect health and ensure the availability of goods and essential services. UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 18 March 2020. URL: https://www.refworld.org/policy/legalguidance/unhcr/2020/en/123162

EU coordinated action to combat the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences. European Parliament resolution of 17 April 2020 on EU coordinated action to combat the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences (2020/2616(RSP)). Brussels. 17 April 2020. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0054_EN.html

The State Aid Temporary Framework. Competition Policy. 2020. URL: https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/state-aid/coronavirus/temporary-framework_en

Consolidated version of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union. 2012. pp. 47–390. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT&from=EN

European Commission. State aid: Commission will phase out State aid COVID Temporary Framework. Brussels. Statement 12 May 2022. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_22_2980

Johnson E.E., Bailey T.C. Legal lessons from a very fast problem: COVID-19. Stanford law review. 2020. Vol. 73. pp. 89–103.

Lasserre B. Les Principes ELI pour la crise du COVID-19. Recueil Dalloz. 2020. № 28. URL: https://www.librairiedalloz.fr/livre/9782993220283-recueil-dalloz-n-28-2020-les-principes-eli-pour-la-crise-du-covid-19-recueil-dalloz-n-28-2020/

Baratta R. EU Soft Law Instruments as a Tool to Tackle the COVID-19 Crisis: Looking at the “Guidance” on Public Procurement Through the Prism of Solidarity. European Papers. 2020. Vol. 5. No 1. pp. 365–373.

Commission Recommendation (EU) 2020/518 of 8 April 2020 on a common Union toolbox for the use of technology and data to combat and exit from the COVID-19 crisis, in particular concerning mobile applications and the use of anonymised mobility data C/2020/3300 (OJ L 114, 14 April 2020, 7–15). Document 32020H0518. Access to European Union law. URL: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reco/2020/518/oj

Published

2024-04-11

How to Cite

Макарчук, К. В. (2024). THE ROLE OF THE EU “SOFT” LAW IN THE FIGHT AGAINST THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC (INITIAL STAGE – MARCH – AUGUST 2020). Kyiv Law Journal, (1), 302-308. https://doi.org/10.32782/klj/2024.1.42

Issue

Section

МІЖНАРОДНЕ ПРАВО