‘THE LAW OF ANNEXED TERRITORY’ IN THE MODERN CONCEPT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW

Authors

  • I. A. Haliakhmetov Educational and Scientific Institute "Law Institute of the Vadym Hetman Kyiv National Economic University"
  • O. V. Kuzmenko Educational and Scientific Institute "Law Institute of the Vadym Hetman Kyiv National Economic University"
  • V. H. Chorna Educational and Scientific Institute "Law Institute of the Vadym Hetman Kyiv National Economic University"

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/klj/2025.1.28

Keywords:

doctrine, International Law, law of conquest, annexation, law of annexed territory, territorial conflicts, sovereignty, state borders, international security, the right of peoples to self-determination, armed conflicts, occupation, Military Law

Abstract

This article examines the international legal norms that prohibit «the law of annexed territory» are fundamental category for modern International Law and Municipal and Property law, whichs are inherent in the Anglo-Saxon legal family. This law as a classical norm from the Ancient Roman Republic (I century BC) is the basis of three options for actions (activities) that have been central to the guidelines for their choice by the relevant subjects of law: (1) to settle title to territory as the basis for establishing state authority within territorial communities, municipalities; (2) to regulate the use of force across established state borders and boundaries of territorial communities (municipalities); and (3) to provide subjects with the right along the lines of established borders or administrative territorial boundaries to determine their own destiny and space for power on their own or collectively. The prohibition of forcible annexation is an integral part of each of these processes, and their combination could have a transformative impact on the legal system as a whole.However, the significance of this issue is often overlooked or misinterpreted. Furthermore, analysts in this field have largely failed to recognize that modern states are engaged in a broader struggle for the future world order and risk the erosion of contemporary international relations.In this article the authors formulate their own definition of «annexation» and present conclusions regarding the role, function, and prerequisites for further consideration of the «law of annexed territory» within the framework of modern International Law, while also highlighting specific legal conflicts related to this issue.

References

IV Конвенція про закони і звичаї війни на суходолі та додаток до неї: Положення про закони і звичаї війни на суходолі від 18.10.1907 р. URL : https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_222#Text

Соглашение о Лиге Наций (Статья Версальского договора об учреждении Лиги Наций). Женева. URL : https://www.ungeneva.org/ru/ about/league-of-nations/covenant

Annexation is a flagrant violation of international law, says UN human rights / expert. 20 June 2019. UN Press releases / Special Procedures. URL : https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2019/06/annexation- flagrant-violation-international-law-says-un-human-rights-expert

Babin B., Chvaliuk A., Plotnikov O. Attempted Annexation of Crimea and Maritime Environment Legal Protection. Lex Portus, 2021. № 7(1). P. 31–52. URL : https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.7.1.2021.2

Brownlie I. H. International Law and the Use of Force by States. 1st edition. Oxford, New York : Oxford University Press/Clarendon Press, 1963. XXVIII, 521 and (index) 11 pages.

Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. URL : https://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/dpilfrcscun/ dpilfrcscun_ph_e.pdf

Draft Code of Offences against the Peace and Security of Mankind with commentaries 1954. URL : https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/ commentaries/7_3_1954.pdf

Draft Declaration on Rights and Duties of States 1949. URL : https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/ english/draft_articles/2_1_1949.pdf

Freeman P. On the Annexation of Provinces to the Roman Empire. Classics Ireland. 1998. Vol. 5. P. 30–47. URL : http://www.classicsireland.com/ 1998/Freeman98.html#n9

Frontier Dispute (Burk. Faso v. Mali), Judgment. 1986 ICJ Rep. 554, para. 26 (Dec. 22). URL : https:// www.icj-cij.org/case/69

Greenwood C. The Relationship between Ius ad Bellum and Ius in Bello. Review of International Studies. 1983. No. 9(4). P. 221–234. URL : https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500115943

Hathaway O. A., Shapiro S. J. The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World. New York : Simon & Schuster, 2017. xxii, 581 pages, 24 unnumbered pages of plates.

Hofmann R. Annexation. URL : https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/ law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1376

Jones v. United States. No. 1143. Decided November 24, 1890. Page 137 U. S. 202, 212. URL : https:// supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/137/202/

League of Nations. Treaty Series Publication of Treaties and International Engagements registered with the Secretariat of the League of Nations. URL : https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/LON/ Volume%2094/v94.pdf

Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965, Summary of the Advisory Opinion, (2019) The International Court of Justice (ICJ). Rep. 95, para. 160 (Feb. 25). URL : https://www.icj-cij.org/case/169

Levine-Schnur R., Megiddo T., Berda Y. A Theory of Annexation (February 5, 2023). URL : https://ssrn. com/abstract=4330338

Lowndes J. The Law of Annexed Territory. Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 11. No. 4 (Dec., 1896). P. 667–693. URL : https://doi.org/10.2307/2139623

Mälksoo L. Illegal Annexation and State Continuity: The Case of the Incorporation of the Baltic States by the USSR. 2nd ed. Leiden : Brill, 2022. 307 pages. URL : https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01 629778.2023.2197723

Merezhko O. Crimea’s Annexation in the Light of International Law. A Critique of Russia’s Legal Argumentation. Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal. 2016. No. 2. P. 37–89.

Ratner S. R. Drawing a Better Line: Uti Possidetis and the Border of New States, The American Journal of International Law. 1996. Vol. 90. No. 4 (Oct,). P. 590–624. URL : https://www.jstor.org/stable/2203988

Republican Congressman Introduces ‘Make Greenland Great Again Act’. To Allow to Trump to Enter Talks of Buying the Country. URL : https://www.latintimes.com/republican-congressman-introduces-make- greenland-great-again-act-allow-trump-enter-talks-572080

Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 March 2014 [without reference to a Main Committee (A/68/L.39 and Add.1)] 68/262. Territorial integrity of Ukraine. URL : https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/ cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/a_res_68_262.pdf

The Notion of Armed Attack under the UN Charter and the Notion of International Armed Conflict – Interrelated or Distinct? LL.M. Paper written under the supervision of Professor Marco Sassòli (2014). URL : https://www.prix-henry-dunant.org/wp-content/uploads/2014_IRMAKKESEN_Paper.pdf

The United Nations and the Iraq-Kuwait conflict, 1990–1996. New York : UN, 1996. 844 p. URL : https:// digitallibrary.un.org/record/205405?v=pdf

UN General Assembly. Resolutions adopted on the reports of the sixth committee. URL : https:// documents.un.org/doc/resolution/gen/nr0/348/90/pdf/ nr034890.pdf

United Nations Charter (full text). URL : https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text

Published

2025-04-24

How to Cite

Галіахметов, І. А., Кузьменко, О. В., & Чорна, В. Г. (2025). ‘THE LAW OF ANNEXED TERRITORY’ IN THE MODERN CONCEPT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW . Kyiv Law Journal, (1), 182-191. https://doi.org/10.32782/klj/2025.1.28

Issue

Section

МІЖНАРОДНЕ ПРАВО

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>