“BEFORE AND AFTER NISIBIS”: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FEATURES OF THE PERSIAN-ROMAN PEACE TREATY OF 363 AD

Authors

  • V. M. Melnyk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/klj/2024.1.1

Keywords:

International Legal Personality, Nisibis Perso-Roman Peace Treaty of 363 AD, Roman Empire, Sasanian Ērānšahr, Great Armenia, Historical Rights, Political Rights, Right of Perpetual Possession, Deportation.

Abstract

Abstract. The article presents the results of a comprehensive textual and narrative study of the Nisibis Perso-Roman Peace Treaty of 363 AD. The agreement was concluded between the authorized representatives of the Roman Empire and Sasanian Iran. It was the result of an unsuccessful military campaign of the Romans, which was carried out during 363 AD. The ideological basis for the march of the Roman forces to the borders of Persia was the desire to conquer a large part of the Iranian lands. Alexander the Great (336-323 BC) was considered an example of imitation in Roman aristocratic circles. Therefore, Imperial Rome aimed at the complete and irreversible defeat of the Sasanian Dynasty (like the destruction of the Achaemenid Dynasty by Alexander the Great in 330 BC). In the end, the emperor Julian the Apostate (361-363) managed to approach the Persian capital (Ctesiphon) but was killed. As a result, the powerful Roman expeditionary corps retreated and was trapped by the main forces of the Persians. The military council quickly elected a new emperor. However, it was Jovian (363-364) who agreed with the Iranian ruler Shapur II (308-380) on the key terms of the Roman-Persian agreements. First, the Roman Empire renounced its “historical rights” to possession in Mesopotamia. Secondly, key fortification points of the borderline were handed over to the Persians, which significantly weakened the defense system of the empire. Thirdly, the agreement provided for the deportation of the Greco-Roman population from Mesopotamia to Syria. They were to be replaced by Iranian colonists. Fourthly, the Romans made Greate Armenia dependent on Iran for thirty years. In addition, the Roman emperor swore not to help Armenia in the event of an oral or written appeal by its basileus to official Constantinople. The article characterizes the key debate between Persian and Roman intellectuals regarding the Armenian dependence on Persia. The attitude of Roman commentators to the facts and circumstances of the conclusion of the agreement is depicted. The tricks used by Emperor Jovian in the case of interpretation of the legal status of Greate Armenia are emphasized. At the same time, the Nisibis Peace Treaty of 363 AD turned out to be a key document for the history of international law of the 4th century. In the end, the consequences of the accepted conditions for the foreign policy course of the successor emperors are specified.

References

Мельник В. М. Нісібіський мирний договір 298 року: питання міжнародної правосуб’єктності у відносинах Римської імперії та Сасанідського Ірану. // Юридичний вісник. 2023. № 4. С. 14-22.

Dignas Beate, Winter Engelbert. Rome and Persia in Late Antiquity. Neighbours and Rivals. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. XVI+347 pp.

The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars AD 226-363. A Documentary History. Ed. by Michael H. Dodgeon, Samuel N. C. Lieu. London-New York: Routledge, 1994. XXIII+430 pp.

Fisher Greg. Between Empires: Arabs, Romans, and Sasanians in Late Antiquity. Oxford Classical Monographs. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. XVI+254 pp.

Chrysos Evangelos. Räumung und Aufgabe von Reichsterritorien. Der Vertrag von 363. // Bonner Jahrbücher. 1993. Bd. 193. S. 165-202.

Ammianus Marcellinus. Das römische Weltreich vor dem Untergang. / Sämtliche erhaltene Bücher. Übersetzt von Otto Veh. Eingeleitet und erläutert von Gerhard Wirth. Zürich und München: Artemis, Die Bibliohek der Alten Welt, 1974. XXX+950 s.

Potter David S. The Roman Empire at Bay: AD 180-395. New York: Routledge, 2004. XXII+762 pp.

The Ecclesiastical History of Socrates, surnamed Scholasticus, or the Advocate. London: H. Bohn, 1853. XX+475 pp.

Cuneo Paola Ombretta. La legislazione di Costantino II, Costanzo II e Costante (337-361). Milano: Giuffrè, 1997. CXVIII+518 pp.

Emperor and Author: The Writings of Julian the Apostate. / Edited by Nicholas Baker-Brian and Shaun Tougher. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 2012. XXI+384 pp.

Pellizzari Andrea. Maestro di retorica, maestro di vita: le lettere teodosiane di Libanio di Antiochia. Roma: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2017. 584 pp.

Chaniotis Angelos. Age of Conquests: The Greek World from Alexander to Hadrian. London and Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2018. XXII+446 pp.

Zosimus. New History. / Editor & Translator: Ronald T. Ridley. Canberra: Australian Association for Byzantine Studies, University of Sydney, 1982. XV+263 pp.

Ta’rikh al-rusul wa’l-mulnk: The History of Al-Ṭabarī. Vol. V. The Sāsānids, the Byzantines, the Lakmids, and Yemen. Translated and annotated by C. E. Bosworth. Albany: State University of New York Press, Columbia University Center for Iranian Studies, 1999. XXXV+458 pp.

де Фріс Вільгельм. Рим і Патріярхати Сходу. / Переклад з німецької О. Конкевича, С. Матіяш. Львів: Видавництво Українського католицького університету, 2015. 416 с.

Smith Kyle. Constantine and the Captive Christians of Persia: Martyrdom and Religious Identity in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2016. XXII+232 pp.

Southern Patricia. The Roman Empire from Severus to Constantine. London: Routledge, 2001. XVI+501 pp.

Schachermeyr Fritz. Alexander der Grosse. Das Problem seiner Persönlichkeit und seines Wirkens. / Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse. Sitzungsberichte. Band 285. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1973. 728 s.

Toumanoff Cyril. Studies in Christian Caucasian History. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1963. 601 pp.

Stathakopoulos Dionysios. A Short History of the Byzantine Empire. London: I. B. Tauris, 2021. 256 pp.

Heather Peter. The Restoration of Rome: Barbarian Popes and Imperial Pretenders. London: Macmillan, 2013. XVIII+470 pp.+XVI ill.

Published

2024-04-10

How to Cite

Мельник, В. М. (2024). “BEFORE AND AFTER NISIBIS”: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FEATURES OF THE PERSIAN-ROMAN PEACE TREATY OF 363 AD. Kyiv Law Journal, (1), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.32782/klj/2024.1.1

Issue

Section

THEORY AND HISTORY OF STATE AND LAW